Cheyenne 1869 extension

Post your FREEWARE 'Works in Progress' here!

Re: Cheyenne 1869 extension

Unread postby DanSSG » Thu Jun 13, 2019 7:52 am

mrennie wrote:Ah yes, the Chama coaling tower! I spent a week making that, only to find out soon afterwards that it dates from the 1920s, which is why I had to replace it with the coaling stage/platform.


I think for refilling the tender that was the better choice, too.

I haven't found any pictures of the Carbon mines yet and also have only very little mining assets in the Clear Creek pack, so I think I'll have to get a bit creative when building this area. But from other mine pictures around 1900 it could be possible that they used such towers to fill the coal gondolas even in 1869 !*don-know!*

If you have some time to spare, could you do me a favor and make a bigger version from that winged bulkhead that you made for the Promontory route, so I can use that in combination with the additional grade lofts?
DanSSG
 
Posts: 191
Joined: Fri May 11, 2018 5:40 am

Re: Cheyenne 1869 extension

Unread postby TranscontinentalFan » Fri Jun 14, 2019 12:06 pm

DanSSG wrote:I haven't found any pictures of the Carbon mines yet and also have only very little mining assets in the Clear Creek pack, so I think I'll have to get a bit creative when building this area. But from other mine pictures around 1900 it could be possible that they used such towers to fill the coal gondolas even in 1869 !*don-know!*


Dan,

I have been a long time follower of this thread and a great admirer of your work. I have joined as I think I can be of some assistance here. There is a picture of a coal tipple at Carbon, taken by J.B. Silvis on this page about half way down - http://cprr.org/Museum/Silvis/

Hope this helps!

Regards,
Colin

P.S. Mike, thanks for your fantastic work, if I see a Smokebox product I buy it at full price, best value for money of any DLC and true simulations of the real locomotives too!
TranscontinentalFan
 

Re: Cheyenne 1869 extension

Unread postby mrennie » Fri Jun 14, 2019 8:35 pm

DanSSG wrote:If you have some time to spare, could you do me a favor and make a bigger version from that winged bulkhead that you made for the Promontory route, so I can use that in combination with the additional grade lofts?


I'll have to decline, unfortunately, because I need to devote all my time now to the Big Boy. The winged bulkhead is actually a standard SP design. The way I dealt with taller grades was simply to build up the terrain under the bulkhead and in some cases I used my rock formations to build it up.
User avatar
mrennie
 
Posts: 3219
Joined: Wed May 30, 2012 12:22 pm

Re: Cheyenne 1869 extension

Unread postby mrennie » Fri Jun 14, 2019 8:36 pm

TranscontinentalFan wrote:P.S. Mike, thanks for your fantastic work, if I see a Smokebox product I buy it at full price, best value for money of any DLC and true simulations of the real locomotives too!


Thanks, very much appreciated :)
User avatar
mrennie
 
Posts: 3219
Joined: Wed May 30, 2012 12:22 pm

Re: Cheyenne 1869 extension

Unread postby DanSSG » Sat Jun 15, 2019 6:12 am

TranscontinentalFan wrote:I have been a long time follower of this thread and a great admirer of your work. I have joined as I think I can be of some assistance here. There is a picture of a coal tipple at Carbon, taken by J.B. Silvis on this page about half way down - http://cprr.org/Museum/Silvis/


Thanks Colin. Yes, that looks a bit like that what I had in mind *!!thnx!!*

mrennie wrote:I'll have to decline, unfortunately, because I need to devote all my time now to the Big Boy.


No problem. It's great to hear that you now got the drawings for the Big Boy *!lol!*
DanSSG
 
Posts: 191
Joined: Fri May 11, 2018 5:40 am

Re: Cheyenne 1869 extension

Unread postby TranscontinentalFan » Sat Jun 15, 2019 6:20 am

I also found some further information here - https://www.hannabasinmuseum.com/1868---1892-town-of-carbon-aka-old-carbon-and-carbon-city.html - it has a wealth of information, including a map, although most images are from the 1870's.
TranscontinentalFan
 

Re: Cheyenne 1869 extension

Unread postby DanSSG » Sun Jun 23, 2019 3:01 pm

TranscontinentalFan wrote:I also found some further information here - https://www.hannabasinmuseum.com/1868---1892-town-of-carbon-aka-old-carbon-and-carbon-city.html - it has a wealth of information, including a map, although most images are from the 1870's.


Much appreciated, thank you *!!thnx!!*
This site is is exactly that bunch of information that I needed. I wonder why I haven't found that while googling !**conf**!
Screenshot_1 Cheyenne 1869 Extension Carbon County_41.87554--106.29039_12-57-32.jpg

Screenshot_1 Cheyenne 1869 Extension Carbon County_41.87707--106.30273_12-58-30.jpg

Screenshot_1 Cheyenne 1869 Extension Carbon County_41.88105--106.31033_12-59-27.jpg


In the 1880s a spur was built straight ahead that leads to Carbon No. 5 mine. I had already layed a small piece of track but didn't know at that time that the mine didn't exist in 1869. The mine was opened in 1880 and abandoned in 1885. It turned out to be poor quality coal.
Screenshot_1 Cheyenne 1869 Extension Carbon County_41.88702--106.33458_13-02-23.jpg

Screenshot_1 Cheyenne 1869 Extension Carbon County_41.88085--106.34125_13-03-50.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
DanSSG
 
Posts: 191
Joined: Fri May 11, 2018 5:40 am

Re: Cheyenne 1869 extension

Unread postby DanSSG » Fri Jul 19, 2019 5:40 pm

That dam and reservoir on the left site is the Smith Reservoir. From the houses next to it are only some piles of wood left over.
Screenshot_1 Cheyenne 1869 Extension Carbon County_41.87655--106.33325_13-01-32.jpg


I have no idea when it was built but I think it's possible that it exits already in the late 19th century.
Screenshot_1 Cheyenne 1869 Extension Carbon County_41.87772--106.33934_13-01-50.jpg


Although Carbon lies near a creek there wasn't much water available because the creek didn't carry much water and was often dried out.
Screenshot_1 Cheyenne 1869 Extension Carbon County_41.87319--106.34058_13-02-20.jpg


Because of that, water was hauled from Medicine Bow and emptied into a town cistern, from which it could be fetched by bucket or barrel for household uses.
Screenshot_1 Cheyenne 1869 Extension Carbon County_41.87309--106.34327_13-02-39.jpg


The lack of water was a nightmare in case of fires especially the fire from 1890 which burned a large part of the business district.
Screenshot_1 Cheyenne 1869 Extension Carbon County_41.86382--106.35200_13-04-33.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
DanSSG
 
Posts: 191
Joined: Fri May 11, 2018 5:40 am

Re: Cheyenne 1869 extension

Unread postby Footplate1 » Fri Jul 19, 2019 6:01 pm

Coming along very nicely. How far do you intend going?
User avatar
Footplate1
 
Posts: 27
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2019 4:42 pm
Location: Newcastle UK

Re: Cheyenne 1869 extension

Unread postby DanSSG » Sat Jul 20, 2019 12:40 am

*!!thnx!!*

Well... I haven't set a final destination at which this route is 'finished'. That's the reason why I release it in stages to the file library.
With stage two we have about 135 miles and I think stage three will be close to 200 but I haven't set an endpoint for this stage yet. I think it could be Rawlins or maybe the former site of Benton, a tent town which existed for just a few month while it was the end of the line.
DanSSG
 
Posts: 191
Joined: Fri May 11, 2018 5:40 am

Re: Cheyenne 1869 extension

Unread postby mrennie » Sat Jul 20, 2019 2:00 pm

Thanks for posting the pictures. The route looks fantastic!
User avatar
mrennie
 
Posts: 3219
Joined: Wed May 30, 2012 12:22 pm

Re: Cheyenne 1869 extension

Unread postby DanSSG » Sun Jul 28, 2019 5:58 pm

While I'm waiting for the reply from Bob Leathers from the Hanna Basin Museum, I started scenery-ing the area between Carbon and Simpson.

This is how Carbon looks at the moment. The big trees are the positions where I think the mines were.
Screenshot_1 Cheyenne 1869 Extension Carbon County_41.84136--106.38122_12-30-51.jpg


Let's go west
Screenshot_1 Cheyenne 1869 Extension Carbon County_41.84652--106.38424_12-36-04.jpg


We start our climb with a 1.0% grade
Screenshot_1 Cheyenne 1869 Extension Carbon County_41.84535--106.39664_12-40-29.jpg


The maximum grade in this area is 1.6% but even with two locos ten coal gondolas are too heavy for this grade
Screenshot_1 Cheyenne 1869 Extension Carbon County_41.84513--106.39866_12-41-06.jpg


Screenshot_1 Cheyenne 1869 Extension Carbon County_41.85004--106.40759_12-43-48.jpg


@Mike: Do you have an idea why sometimes the smoke from the smokestack is missing when double-heading?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
DanSSG
 
Posts: 191
Joined: Fri May 11, 2018 5:40 am

Re: Cheyenne 1869 extension

Unread postby mrennie » Mon Jul 29, 2019 8:31 am

DanSSG wrote:@Mike: Do you have an idea why sometimes the smoke from the smokestack is missing when double-heading?


The double-heading code in the TS core is extremely buggy, especially for steam locos (and worst of all when it's a steam+diesel combo). It sometimes gives the player-driven loco's (PDL's) script some corrupted values, or a mixture of values for that loco combined with other values from the AI loco (which are very simplified and sometimes zero or random). Perhaps the only saving grace is that in my DLC, the PDL sends data to the AI's script so that it can try to imitate what the PDL is doing, so at least they should both emit smoke of (more or less) the same density and colour most of the time.
User avatar
mrennie
 
Posts: 3219
Joined: Wed May 30, 2012 12:22 pm

Re: Cheyenne 1869 extension

Unread postby SAR704 » Tue Aug 20, 2019 11:39 pm

Would it not be practical to add an additional animation for the leading loco? As in where the smoke spawns from where the chimney is on the rear one? IE two separate smoke animations being active from the same boiler, but spawned at different positions.

I haven't built steam engines at all, so only taking a wild guess here!
Geforce GTX 1060
16GB RAM
Intel Core i5-3350 3.10ghz
Win te(n) Home
SAR704
 
Posts: 716
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 9:48 am
Location: Adelaide, South Australia

Re: Cheyenne 1869 extension

Unread postby buzz456 » Wed Aug 21, 2019 7:53 am

I have run several double headers where the smoke works just fine. About the only thing I have noticed is that when feeding coal in usually the back loco never turns black. Someone has this figured out.
Buzz
39 and holding.
"Some people find fault like there's a reward for it."- Zig Ziglar
"If you can dream it you can do it."- Walt Disney
Image
User avatar
buzz456
Site Admin
 
Posts: 20939
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 8:30 am
Location: SW Florida

PreviousNext

Return to Freeware WIP

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: kris120 and 1 guest