Question on Rail Simulator File Structure

Discussion of rolling-stock creation & re-painting.

Question on Rail Simulator File Structure

Unread postby TVRRMAN » Tue Aug 04, 2009 4:06 pm

During my time of working to finish out my first Rail Simulator / Railworks addon, I've worked extensively to make each car in my sets work somewhat independently, but also leaves me to the following question: Is the "Default" folder with a default car really required, or can I get away with the sets self-supporting themselves without it? Thanks in advance,
Thomas J Pearce
Image
http://www.bllw.net
Broadway Limited Locomotive Works Payware Department
TVRRMAN
 
Posts: 213
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 8:06 pm
Location: Near Pittsburgh PA

Re: Question on Rail Simulator File Structure

Unread postby savv_nz » Tue Aug 04, 2009 7:26 pm

I've never used the 'default' folder, just one more on a loooong list of folders to my eyes. Doesnt seem to cause any issue at all by not having it.
Cheers,

Stefan van Vliet

TSNZ Webmaster http://www.tsnz.co.nz
NZTS Workshops Co-Founder
TSNZ Discord https://discord.gg/RD6MsgM
savv_nz
 
Posts: 64
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 7:52 am

Re: Question on Rail Simulator File Structure

Unread postby Bananarama » Wed Aug 05, 2009 4:26 am

As long as you have your own developer folder, you can set it up any way you like - place cars in the scenery folder, trees in the texture folders, or create one big fat glob of a folder with textures and shapes. It would appear, that whatever works for you also works for the sim. :D
Cheers!
Marc - 3DTrains

Image
User avatar
Bananarama
 
Posts: 2749
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 1:17 am
Location: Another Planet

Re: Question on Rail Simulator File Structure

Unread postby ricksan » Wed Aug 05, 2009 1:54 pm

The only thing that matters is having the correct file-path references in the blueprints. The folders and their names can be set up any way that makes sense to you.

It looks to me like Kuju intended for the "Default" folder to include all the basic elements of a particular type of rolling stock, then added separate folders for alternate versions. The alternate-version folders only have the files for things that are actually different for the particular variation. Everything else refers back to files under the Default folder.

Kuju could just as easily have named the folder "Common" or something else. In fact, along those same lines, the Common folder could be limited to just that: "bogie" XMLs, textures--anything that's "common" to all the variations. Then all of the variations, including the so-called "default" variation, could reside in separate folders of their own. For example...

Code: Select all
Freight
  Boxcars
    Common (truck blueprints)
      Textures (trucks, wheels)
    Railbox (railcar blueprint, IGS, numbering csv)
      Textures (specific texture maps, numbers)
    Conrail
    MKT
    etc.


This is just one way you could organize things, but as Marc said, you can put the whole lot in, say, the Boxcars folder if you wanted. The only caveat is the texture-file path references you used in your modeling program are coded in the IGS file. That means if, after exporting, you decide to move the ACE textures to a different folder you'll get file-not-found errors in the Blueprint Editor.
ricksan
Forum Mod
 
Posts: 311
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 10:55 am
Location: Bandon, OR USA


Return to Rolling-Stock Design

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: SebKu and 1 guest