Page 1 of 1

Cumberland Terminal article

Unread postPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 8:55 am
by ElphabaWS
New article available at Train-Simulator.com on the upcoming TSW Sand Patch route, this one exploring Cumberland Terminal:

See: https://train-simulator.com/heartbeat-of-a-railroad/

Re: Cumberland Terminal article

Unread postPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 10:11 am
by dejoh
Nice article. I inquired to DTG about the hump facilities operation for TSW users, if we could shove cars for classification. Their response was "NOT AT THIS TIME".
That's too bad. I could spend hours in the hump yard. !*don-know!*

Re: Cumberland Terminal article

Unread postPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 10:49 am
by buzz456
humping.jpeg

Re: Cumberland Terminal article

Unread postPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 10:55 am
by dejoh
Makes my day. slow day at my job. !*roll-laugh*!
Guilty of swaying away from this thread.
campbell.jpg

Re: Cumberland Terminal article

Unread postPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 2:39 pm
by ex-railwayman
The thing that surprised me is that DTG haven't included a CSX Switcher as one of the dedicated locos included with the base game, that would have been excellent, I hope one is on the drawing board, an MP15, or, SW1500, would go down rather well on this route, personally speaking. !!*ok*!!

Cheerz. ex-railwayman.

Re: Cumberland Terminal article

Unread postPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 2:54 pm
by dejoh
Very good point. I'm guessing this would be a very popular locomotive to model.

csx.jpg

Re: Cumberland Terminal article

Unread postPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 3:28 pm
by Derek
hmmm, a switcher you say....

Re: Cumberland Terminal article

Unread postPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 4:00 pm
by artimrj
Aren't GP38s, road switchers?

Re: Cumberland Terminal article

Unread postPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 4:06 pm
by bpetit
artimrj wrote:Aren't GP38s, road switchers?


Correct, SD40-2s too nowadays.

Re: Cumberland Terminal article

Unread postPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 4:24 pm
by plovdiv21
Derek wrote:hmmm, a switcher you say....

Yes a switcher,just like the one in the picture,maybe even an older version.

Re: Cumberland Terminal article

Unread postPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 5:45 pm
by ElphabaWS
bpetit wrote:
artimrj wrote:Aren't GP38s, road switchers?


Correct, SD40-2s too nowadays.

Well noted. GP38-2s are regularly used for switching duties and the standard power assigned to Cumberland hump and classification yards are 2400-series SD40-2s. I don't believe CSX has used end-cab switchers at Cumberland (or elsewhere on Sand Patch) in a long time.

Re: Cumberland Terminal article

Unread postPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2017 12:46 pm
by bpetit
Could be a nice throwback though.

Re: Cumberland Terminal article

Unread postPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2017 2:05 pm
by _o_OOOO_oo-Kanawha
ElphabaWS wrote:
bpetit wrote:
artimrj wrote:Aren't GP38s, road switchers?


Correct, SD40-2s too nowadays.

Well noted. GP38-2s are regularly used for switching duties and the standard power assigned to Cumberland hump and classification yards are 2400-series SD40-2s. I don't believe CSX has used end-cab switchers at Cumberland (or elsewhere on Sand Patch) in a long time.


Future motive power additions depend on what other CSX routes will emerge or wether we will go back in time when SW type locomotives were still common in yards, and when there were a lot more yards in operation.

Cumberland is the yard at one end, but what about the other end of the route? Without a working hump operation, I don't think a large yard will hold the average players interest for long.

We'll know in less than a week what the first installment of TSW has to offer.