Railworks America

I would like to know where this scenario would be located under, and what route it's on.
Because it has a RWP file not sure where it would be.

Thanks,
Bob

It must be for Sherman Hill.....I mean, looking at the title

Ok Thanks. Will have a look and see what happens.

Thanks again.

If you are talking about UP Military Special East on Sherman Hill, it comes with the TS Rewards - FlatCarPack01.

He refers to this one from the library:
http://railworksamerica.com/index.php/download-library/scenarios?view=document&id=2121:military-yardwork-cheyenne&catid=21:scenarios

This scenario is not working for me.
I have downloaded and installed this scenario several times,trying to get it working without any good results.
I keep getting the Edit or exit window, with a list of engines that can't be loaded. I know I have these engines because I loaded up another route and loaded
up all of these engines on the list.
I'm wondering if anyone else has got this scenario running?
I sure would like to run this scenario.

thanks,

It won't run for me either.

Some of the locomotives have a non-standard path. That can be fixed by "swapping" with RW_Tools.

ChrisOnline has discovered what the problem is with the loco paths and hopefully is working on a solution.

Overshoe wrote:Some of the locomotives have a non-standard path. That can be fixed by "swapping" with RW_Tools.

This worked perfectly.

Thanks Overshoe for solving the problem by swapping locos with RW Tools.
However I am not confident enough to use RW Tools when there are ap. files involved.

Would you or Buzz be able to package a working version for me - I would very much appreciate it.

John

JohnMcEwen wrote:ChrisOnline has discovered what the problem is with the loco paths and hopefully is working on a solution.

John
Hopefully Chris will find out why the Sherman Hill Assets are as such otherwise you will always have this problem with those Assets if you create more scenarios. I recently had the same issue with another scenario by another author using other assets on a different route. My own personal opinion in this particular case was that the assets may have been unpacked wrong to start with and will always create a problem when other users try to run that scenario.

Just my worth

Buzz has kindly corrected the scenario for me and I am uploading it as SH-JMcE-002a to distinguish from the faulty 002.
Thanks for your patience.
Also thanks for your comment qrfan3
John

Sorry, I am away this weekend. I'm glad Buzz was able to help.