Possible Scenario Problem

The RWA Lakeside Route project discussion.

Moderator: ricksan

Possible Scenario Problem

Unread postby dcushing » Mon May 26, 2014 7:47 pm

In the scenario 'Mine shuttle" I am frustrated by a red signal at the north end of the wye leading to the mine branch. The signal at the diverging point is yellow and the next is red. Requesting permission to pass gets a negative result and ignoring the signal gives a scenario fail after returning the loaded ore cars to the interchange track.

And as an afterthought, should those ore cars sway as much as they do?

Duncan
dcushing
 
Posts: 297
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 8:08 pm

Re: Possible Scenario Problem

Unread postby buzz456 » Mon May 26, 2014 8:11 pm

Are you sure you had the switches set correctly? I have run that a couple of times and everything was OK.
Buzz
39 and holding.
"Some people find fault like there's a reward for it."- Zig Ziglar
"If you can dream it you can do it."- Walt Disney
Image
User avatar
buzz456
Site Admin
 
Posts: 20902
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 8:30 am
Location: SW Florida

Re: Possible Scenario Problem

Unread postby dcushing » Mon May 26, 2014 8:19 pm

I'll have to rerun the scenario and will check.

Duncan
dcushing
 
Posts: 297
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 8:08 pm

Re: Possible Scenario Problem

Unread postby Chacal » Mon May 26, 2014 8:29 pm

Only the switches with an animated switchman are automatic. All the rest are manual.
Also try saving and reloading the scenario.
Over the hill and gathering speed
Chacal
Site Admin
 
Posts: 6464
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2011 1:11 pm
Location: Quebec, Canada

Re: Possible Scenario Problem

Unread postby OldProf » Tue May 27, 2014 9:24 am

Automated switchman? How have I missed that so far?

Getting back to the original issue, yes, there is a manual switch to set at the point described. This is always worth checking on the 2D map when an otherwise unexplainable red signal occurs.
Tom Pallen (Old Prof)

{Win 10 Home 64-bit; Intel Core i7 6700 @ 3.40GHz; 16.0GB Single-Channel @ 1063 MHz (15-15-15-364); 2047MB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960}
User avatar
OldProf
 
Posts: 2755
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:09 am

Re: Possible Scenario Problem

Unread postby Ericmopar » Tue May 27, 2014 2:13 pm

I had to wait quite awhile last night, for the signal to change to green and had to hit the Tab button about 3 times before I got permission to pass.

I failed that scenario last night, but it was because I cut the caboose loose on mine siding 1 when the train was just coming to a stop. The program interpreted that as not dropping off the ore empties, even though I stopped a few feet later and did drop off all the empties in siding 1.
New build. i7-7700k, MSI Z270 Gaming M5 Mobo, Hyper 212 Evo, Corsair DDR4 3200 Mhz RAM, Klipsch Pro Mediea 2.1 Speakers, Samsung 850 Evo SSD, HAF XM Case, Asus Strix GTX 1070 and Cooler Master Storm XT Keyboard.
Slick with Pretty Rainbow Colors.
User avatar
Ericmopar
 
Posts: 2814
Joined: Mon May 13, 2013 12:35 am
Location: Henderson NV.

Re: Possible Scenario Problem

Unread postby dcushing » Wed May 28, 2014 5:55 pm

I have gone back and am re-running the scenario. I still get a red signal at the top of the wye. I have saved and reloaded and on a restart can actually watch the signal change to red. Requesting permission with the tab key gets a negative answer. So I'm stuck. What am I doing wrong?

Duncan
dcushing
 
Posts: 297
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 8:08 pm

Re: Possible Scenario Problem

Unread postby buzz456 » Wed May 28, 2014 6:24 pm

I still don't get it I just ran this and here are the signals as I approached the 'Y''.

RWA9.jpg


RWA10.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Buzz
39 and holding.
"Some people find fault like there's a reward for it."- Zig Ziglar
"If you can dream it you can do it."- Walt Disney
Image
User avatar
buzz456
Site Admin
 
Posts: 20902
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 8:30 am
Location: SW Florida

Re: Possible Scenario Problem

Unread postby dcushing » Wed May 28, 2014 6:42 pm

buzz456 wrote:I still don't get it I just ran this and here are the signals as I approached the 'Y''.

RWA9.jpg


RWA10.jpg

I'm sorry, I must not have explained myself clearly. I'm coming from the opposite direction heading for the mine, not away from it. I'm stilling pulling the empties.

Duncan
dcushing
 
Posts: 297
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 8:08 pm

Re: Possible Scenario Problem

Unread postby buzz456 » Wed May 28, 2014 7:02 pm

Ah ha! I will have to check that out. Thanks.
Buzz
39 and holding.
"Some people find fault like there's a reward for it."- Zig Ziglar
"If you can dream it you can do it."- Walt Disney
Image
User avatar
buzz456
Site Admin
 
Posts: 20902
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 8:30 am
Location: SW Florida

Re: Possible Scenario Problem

Unread postby buzz456 » Wed May 28, 2014 7:57 pm

Yep I agree, you are right. It's fubar.
Buzz
39 and holding.
"Some people find fault like there's a reward for it."- Zig Ziglar
"If you can dream it you can do it."- Walt Disney
Image
User avatar
buzz456
Site Admin
 
Posts: 20902
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 8:30 am
Location: SW Florida

Re: Possible Scenario Problem

Unread postby Friedy » Fri May 30, 2014 6:17 am

As the author ( culprit : ) *!rolleyes!* Yes the red signal is a real problem. Many scenario writers have run into this situation that seems to be embedded in the Kuju legacy coding: The round trip bug. If a scenario is an "out and back" using a single signaled path, the dispatch function of the software sees the return trip as an interfering AI creating a red signal. The solution is to break the scenario into two parts. one part out and another for the return.
OK so how did this get past QC? This was one of the earliest scenario written, used initially to check the route at Waterton. The mine and logging branches were not yet developed and I failed to re-run the scenario to completion later. I hope that you all will not see this as a reflection of the overall quality of the route or the skills of the rest of the team.
For those who can't bring themselves to pass a red and get the dreaded red "X" and have the required scenario writing skills: Breaking the scenario into two parts by first creating a clone of the scenario solves the problem ( The signal at the top of the wye does go "green ) when the new Part 1 ends with the delivery at the mine. I will re-create the scenario as a two part and will contact Bob to see how he wants to deal with a possible patch or new scenario posting.
Friedy
 

Re: Possible Scenario Problem

Unread postby Ericmopar » Fri May 30, 2014 9:00 am

Well, here's my weird twist on this.
I get the red on the way there, and get a green on the way back.
I do get around the red going to the mine, but I must wait for a few minutes and hit tab more than once. I haven't tried hitting tab once and then waiting, yet.
New build. i7-7700k, MSI Z270 Gaming M5 Mobo, Hyper 212 Evo, Corsair DDR4 3200 Mhz RAM, Klipsch Pro Mediea 2.1 Speakers, Samsung 850 Evo SSD, HAF XM Case, Asus Strix GTX 1070 and Cooler Master Storm XT Keyboard.
Slick with Pretty Rainbow Colors.
User avatar
Ericmopar
 
Posts: 2814
Joined: Mon May 13, 2013 12:35 am
Location: Henderson NV.

Re: Possible Scenario Problem

Unread postby CrimsonKing » Fri May 30, 2014 10:46 am

I ran the "Mine Shuttle" scenario with no problems. All I had to do is set the switches in the Gogebic Mine to route the train correctly.
Will

NERW Engineer.
User avatar
CrimsonKing
 
Posts: 166
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2012 6:07 pm
Location: CO

Re: Possible Scenario Problem

Unread postby OldProf » Fri May 30, 2014 12:33 pm

CrimsonKing wrote:I ran the "Mine Shuttle" scenario with no problems. All I had to do is set the switches in the Gogebic Mine to route the train correctly.


Ditto.
Tom Pallen (Old Prof)

{Win 10 Home 64-bit; Intel Core i7 6700 @ 3.40GHz; 16.0GB Single-Channel @ 1063 MHz (15-15-15-364); 2047MB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960}
User avatar
OldProf
 
Posts: 2755
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:09 am

Next

Return to The RWA Lakeside Route

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest