Has something been changed in the way scenarios are named since my RW_Tools doesn't display the name correctly anymore and I had to use the UUID to find and edit my scenario.
It apparently read the first <String> below the <ID> block, while the <DisplayName> is below the <String> block. That <String> block was previously unused because it was only a single </String> delimeter. It is mostly Tom and Eric now, the first lines in the <String> block.
Is it safe to use RW_Tools or do we better wait for an update as perhaps the file and/or xml structure has been changed otherwise as well, with all those fancy introduction animations?
Edited: other than that RW_Tools behaved as expected, I was able to swap some rolling stock. Didn't do anything more difficult.
Further edited: after duplicating a few cars and swapping them for the UP water canteen tenders to go with my copy of scenario 6: now named Employee Excursion Challenged, TS now won't allow me to run or edit the scenario anymore. SBHH without any useable information as always.
I have experience before that editing a scenario with both the in-game editor and RW_Tools leads to faulty results, but I know of no other means to copy all of the tasks from one engine to the other. The Sherman Hill scenarios have the engines loaded with tasks, so I just have to try again and this time swap only the lead engine in RW_Tools and the rest in the editor. Tedious, but probably safe.
Edited once more: the latest RW_Tools 4.0.10 didn't solve the problem.